CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REVOCATION OF THE SPECIAL STATUS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Abstract

The drafters of the Indian Constitution sought to make the country sovereign, stable, peaceful and to protect the human rights of its people. The Constitution plays a very important role in putting the country's judicial system on the right track to deal with today's complex real-life scenarios, and the future of our parliamentary system is secured by the current or new constitution. I'm here. However, the controversial Article 370, which gives Jammu and Kashmir broad powers as a self-governing body, raises many complex issues, including threats to the unity of the country, and our government: Split the state into two successor "Union Territories" with additional limited administrative powers.. This provision was a "temporary provision" and it was essential to repeal, amend or delete this provision. Article 370 has a historical background that is not derived from legal or constitutional considerations, but it contains complex political and religious aspects that affect the very complex issue of the border between India and Pakistan. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the creator of the Indian constitution, has been vehemently opposed to the inclusion of Article 370 since the matter's inception. A good mix of Muslims (Kashmiris - Divine Wisdom) and Buddhists (Ladakh from Tibet University Lhasa) has given us a unique culture and a progressive attitude to transform the unstable situation of the country into a peaceful one. We hope this will provide opportunities for future improvements, an enlightening and progressive development under the umbrella of the Indian Constitution. The author does not agree with the special status enshrined in Article 370 of the new constitution.