Precision, Personalization, and Progress: Traditional and Adaptive Assessment in Undergraduate Medical Education

Ritcha Saxena; Kevin Carnevale; Oleg Yakymovych; Michael Salzle; Kapil Sharma; Ritwik Raj Saxena

doi:10.36676/irt.2023-v9i4-029

Authors

Ritcha Saxena 1*Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
Kevin Carnevale Department of Pathology, Des Moines College of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Iowa, USA
Oleg Yakymovych Department of Internal Medicine, Sound Physicians, Saint James Hospital, Butte, Montana, USA
Michael Salzle Department of Internal Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, California, USA
Kapil Sharma Department of Information Technology, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, India
Ritwik Raj Saxena Department of Computer Science and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.2023-v9i4-029

Keywords:

comprehensive review, high-quality healthcare, embracing adaptive assessments

Abstract

Medical education is a continuously evolving field, shaped by centuries of innovation and transformation. This article explores the integration of adaptive and traditional assessments in medical education, highlighting their significance in fostering competent, adaptable, and resilient future healthcare professionals. The ongoing evolution of medical education requires adaptive, flexible methodologies capable of assessing a wide range of competencies, from clinical skills to ethical conduct and the ability to drive changes in healthcare delivery. Adaptive assessments are at the forefront of reshaping medical education. Adaptive assessments provide personalized evaluation, bridging the gap between theory and practice, enhancing effectiveness and empathy in medical education. They ensure precision in evaluation, individualized learning paths, and optimized learning efficiency. Real-time feedback, minimized bias, and data-driven insights further enrich the learning experience. This collaborative approach fosters an environment where students and educators work together toward academic excellence. By continuously refining assessment methods, medical education equips students with the adaptability needed in modern healthcare. As medical education advances, the integration of adaptive and traditional assessments remains at the vanguard, shaping the future of medical education and the quality of patient care. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for educators and learners, sparking constructive dialogues and motivating individuals to enhance their learning processes, ultimately contributing to the delivery of high-quality healthcare services. It underlines the importance of embracing adaptive assessments and their pivotal role in the future of medical education.

References

Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220-227. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449.

Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131-2132. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5227.

Norman G. Medical education: past, present and future. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(1):6-14. doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0002-7.

Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387-396. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054784

Wisdom J, Creswell JW. Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 13.

Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387-396. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054784

Hadi AA, Zain NM. Student’s perception toward program outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Educ Res. 2016;4:3-257-264.

Ferris HA, O'Flynn D. Assessment in medical education: what are we trying to achieve. Int J Higher Educ. 2015;4(2):139-144. Doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p139.

Wisdom JP, Cavaleri MA, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Green CA. Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:721-745.

Picton A, Greenfield S, Parry J. Why do students struggle in their first year of medical school? A qualitative study of student voices. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:100. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03158-4.

Weurlander M, Lönn A, Seeberger A, Hult H, Thornberg R, Wernerson A. Emotional challenges of medical students generate feelings of uncertainty. Med Educ. 2019;53(10):1037-1048. doi:10.1111/medu.13934.

Sharma N, Doherty I, Dong C. Adaptive Learning in Medical Education: The Final Piece of Technology Enhanced Learning?. Ulster Med J. 2017;86(3):198-200.

Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Med Educ. 2009;43(2):127-132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03254.x.