Economic history - economic law

Authors

  • Meenu rani Assistant professor of Economic Govt. P.G. College Hisar”

Keywords:

law & economics, mathematical models, economists interested

Abstract

The roots of law & economics lie in late 19th century continental Europe. However, this early movement did not persist, having been cut off in the 1930s. After World War II, modern law & economics was (re-)invented in the United States and subsequently grew into a major field of research at U.S. law schools. In continental Europe, law & economics was re-imported as a discipline within economics, driven by economists interested in legal issues rather than by legal scholars. Hence, the European discourse was more strongly influenced by formal analysis, using mathematical models. Today, research in the U.S., Europe, and in other countries around the world, including Latin America and Asia, uses formal, empirical, and intuitive methods. New subfields, such as behavioral law & economics and experimental law & eco- nomics, have grown in the U.S. and in Europe during the past two decades.

References

• Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

• Butler, H.N. 1999. The Manne Programs in Economics for Federal Judges. Case Western Re- serve Law Review 50(2), 351-420.

• Calabresi, G. 1961. Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts. Yale Law Journal 70(4), 499-553.

• Calabresi, G. 1965). The Decision for Accidents: An Approach to Non-Fault Allocation of Costs. Harvard Law Review 78(4), 713-745.

• Dau-Schmidt, K.G. and Brun, C.L. 2006. Lost in Translation: The Economic Analysis of Law in the United States and Europe. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44(2), 602- 621.

• Depoorter, B. and Demot, J. 2011. The Cross-Atlantic Law and Economics divide: A Dissent.

University of Illinois Law Review 2011, 1593-1606.

• Engel, C. 2013. Legal Experiments: Mission Impossible? The Haag: Eleven Internat. Publ.

Engel, C. 2010. The Multiple Uses of Experimental Evidence in Legal Scholarship. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166, 199-202.

• Ellickson, R.C. 1989. Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics. Chicago-Kent Law Review 65(1), 23-56.

• Garoupa, N. and Ulen, T.S. 2008. The Market for Legal Innovation: Law and Economics in Europe and the United States. Alabama Law Review 59(5), 1555-1633.

• Gazal-Ayal, O. 2007. Economic Analysis of Law and Economics. Capital University Law Review 35(3), 787-809.

• Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.S. and Thaler, R. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.

Stanford Law Review 50(5), 1471-1550.

• Kirchner, C. 1991. The difficult reception of law and economics in Germany. International Review of Law and Economics 11(3), 277–292.

• Litschka, M. and Grechenig, K. 2010. Law by Human Intent or Evolution? Some Remarks on the Austrian School of Economics’ Role in the Development of Law and Economics. European Journal of Law and Economics 29(1), 57-79.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Meenu rani. (2023). Economic history - economic law. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(2), 38–41. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/633