Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of TATA Group
Keywords:
CSR activities, TATA group, TATA Steel, Social WelfareAbstract
For a considerable amount of time, the leaders of the Tata Group have held the belief that monetary success is only significant if it is obtained in a manner that is both just and ethical, and if it is beneficial to the nation. J. R. D. Tata, who served as the chairman of the Tata Group from 1938 to 1991, was of the opinion that it was not sufficient to merely provide employees with comfortable housing, fair compensation, and favorable working circumstances. According to his point of view, businesses ought to likewise concentrate on the social duties that they have for the community and society that surrounds them. He was well aware that the government could not achieve social growth on its own, particularly in a country as diverse as India. Labor assistance programs were initially developed in this country before they were incorporated into the legal systems of other nations.
References
• Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of management review, 16(3), 586-612.
• Advantage, S. T. C., Borgonovi, V., Meier, S., Sharda, M., &Vaidyanathan, L. (2011). Creating Shared Value in India.
• Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US* Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147-158.
• Ahire, S.L., D.Y. Golhar and M.A. Waller, (1996). Development and Validation of TQM implementation constructs.,27:23-56.
• Albareda, L. (2008). Corporate responsibility, governance and accountability: from selfregulation to co-regulation. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 430-439
• Bowen, H. R, Social responsibilities of the businessman(New York: Harper & Row, 1953)
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
• Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and society review, 100(1),
• Castelo Branco, M., & Lima Rodriques, L (2007).Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility.
• Davis, Keith, Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? (California
• Management Review, Spring, 1960)
• Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2 The Maturing of Business-and-Society Thought. Business & Society, 33(2), 150-164.
• Mark Goyder, Redefining CSR: From the Rhetoric of Accountability to the Reality of Earning Trust (Tomorrow's Company, 2003) [7]
• Wood, D.J. , Towards improving corporate social performance (Business Horizons, Vol. 34 No. 4, World Business Council for Sustainable Development 1991) pp. 66-73
• Khan, R. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility : A Case Study of TATA Group ( emphasizing on TATA Steel ). 24–33.
• Kumbar, P. S. (2017). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY : A CASE STUDY OF TATA MOTORS. 12, 23–26.
• Mohapatra, S. (2018). Tata as a Sustainable Enterprise : The Causal Role of Spirituality. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685818774116
• Mondal, T. (2021). Case Study of Tata Steel Ltd . for CSR Spending , after implementation of Companies Act , 2013 . 6(1), 57–60.
• Srivastava, A. K. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study Of TATA Group. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3(5), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-0351727
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Innovative Research Thoughts
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.