Innovative Approaches to Project Scheduling: Techniques and Tools

Authors

  • SUNIL KUMAR SUVVARI Independent Researcher, USA
  • DR. VIMAL DEEP SAXENA ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, SINHGAD BUSINESS SCHOOL, PUNE, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v10.i2.1481

Keywords:

Project Scheduling, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Cloud-Based Tools, Risk-Aware Scheduling, Lean Principles, Data Visualization, Blockchain, Virtual Reality, Quantum Computing

Abstract

Project scheduling is essential to project management as it aligns project resources, costs, and duration. Thus, this research paper aims to identify and discuss new ideas in project scheduling and the tools that may be useful these days. The topics considered in the study include the AI and machine learning, cloud-based collaboration, risk-aware scheduling techniques, and lean scheduling. This paper will discuss these new methods and contrast them with conventional project scheduling methodologies to help project managers and researchers establish a baseline knowledge and understanding of current and possibly future practices in project scheduling. It compiles data from many empirical studies and industry reports to provide clues on the performance and popularity of diverse scheduling frameworks.

References

Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galán, J. M., & López-Paredes, A. (2014). A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 423-434.

Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.

Ballard, G., & Howell, G. (2003). Lean project management. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 119-133.

Behera, P., Mohanty, R. P., & Prakash, A. (2015). Understanding construction supply chain management. Production Planning & Control, 26(16), 1332-1350.

Daniel, E. I., Pasquire, C., & Dickens, G. (2015). Exploring the implementation of the Last Planner® System through IGLC community: twenty one years of experience. In 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (pp. 153-162).

de Reyck, B., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S. R., Moura, M., & Sloper, A. (2015). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 971-986.

Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2010). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.

Gartner. (2020). Market Guide for Project and Portfolio Management Software. Gartner Research.

Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2004). The goal: A process of ongoing improvement. Routledge.

Hamzeh, F. R., Ballard, G., & Tommelein, I. D. (2012). Rethinking lookahead planning to optimize construction workflow. Lean Construction Journal, 2012, 15-34.

Hartmann, T., Gao, J., & Fischer, M. (2012). Areas of application for 3D and 4D models on construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(5), 697-707.

Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2010). A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 1-14.

Kerzner, H. (2019). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical chain project management. Artech House.

Li, J., Greenwood, D., & Kassem, M. (2019). Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Automation in Construction, 102, 288-307.

Liberatore, M. J., & Pollack-Johnson, B. (2013). Improving project management decision making by modeling quality, time, and cost continuously. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), 518-528.

MacCrimmon, K. R., & Ryavec, C. A. (1964). An analytical study of the PERT assumptions. Operations Research, 12(1), 16-37.

Millhiser, W. P., & Szmerekovsky, J. G. (2012). Teaching critical chain project management: the academic debate and illustrative examples. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 12(2), 67-77.

Mordor Intelligence. (2020). Mobile Project Management Software Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2021-2026). Mordor Intelligence.

Pellerin, R., & Perrier, N. (2019). A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and control. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2160-2178.

Pollack, J., Helm, J., & Adler, D. (2018). What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 527-547.

Project Management Institute. (2019). Pulse of the Profession 2019. PMI.

Project Management Institute. (2020). Pulse of the Profession 2020. PMI.

Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051.

Software Advice. (2019). Project Management Software User Report. Software Advice.

Venturelli, D., Marchand, D. J., & Rojo, G. (2020). Quantum computation of combinatorial optimization problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05172.

Wauters, M., & Vanhoucke, M. (2016). A comparative study of artificial intelligence methods for project duration forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 249-261.

Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012). A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41-59.

Zheng, X., Wang, L., & Wang, S. (2017). A novel multi-agent system to solve the time-dependent project scheduling problem. Information Sciences, 385, 142-158.

Zollmann, S., Hoppe, C., Kluckner, S., Poglitsch, C., Bischof, H., & Reitmayr, G. (2018). Augmented reality for construction site monitoring and documentation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 106(4), 586-605.

Swamy, H. (2020). Unsupervised machine learning for feedback loop processing in cognitive DevOps settings. Yingyong Jichu yu Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 17(1), 168-183. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382654014

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.36676/irt.v10.i2.1481
Published: 2024-06-30

How to Cite

SUNIL KUMAR SUVVARI, & DR. VIMAL DEEP SAXENA. (2024). Innovative Approaches to Project Scheduling: Techniques and Tools. Innovative Research Thoughts, 10(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v10.i2.1481