Managing Project Scope Creep: Strategies for Containing Changes

Authors

  • SUNIL KUMAR SUVVARI INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v8.i4.1475

Keywords:

Project Management, Scope Creep, Change Control, Requirements Management, Stakeholder Management, Work Breakdown Structure, Earned Value Management

Abstract

This research paper aims to explore the problem of scope creep in project management and identify possible measures to address changes. Scope creep, a significant challenge that threatens overall project success, refers to the uncontrolled growth of project scope, negatively affecting project cost, time, and quality. By evaluating the causes of scope creep, prevention measures, and management approaches, this research sought to give project managers rich resources to prevent and control scope creep risks. The work complexes and integrates data from various scholarly articles, stakeholder reports, and case studies to propose a scope management system. Some tactical areas are to refine the project scope definition, establish sound change control procedures, use sophisticated project management tools and techniques, and manage stakeholders. This paper summarises the study findings and recommendations on best practices in project scope management and suggestions for future research

References

Association for Project Management (APM). (2019). The State of Project Management: Annual Survey 2019. London: APM Publishing.

Davis, R., & Miller, K. (2020). Impact of Work Breakdown Structures on Project Performance. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 412-425.

Ellis, C. (2019). The Role of Project Definition in Scope Management. International Journal of Project Management, 37(3), 498-510.

Gartner. (2020). Market Guide for Project and Portfolio Management Software. Stamford: Gartner, Inc.

Harvard Business Review. (2019). The High Cost of Project Failure. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 72-79.

IEEE Software. (2019). Requirements Traceability: A Systematic Review. IEEE Software, 36(3), 92-104.

International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management. (2020). Visual Communication in Project Management: A Quantitative Analysis. IJISPM, 8(2), 67-82.

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. (2019). Earned Value Management and Project Success: A Meta-Analysis. IJMPB, 12(4), 908-931.

International Journal of Project Management. (2020). Key Performance Indicators for Scope Management: An Empirical Study. IJPM, 38(5), 271-285.

Johnson, L., Smith, M., & Brown, K. (2020). Stakeholder-Initiated Scope Changes: A Multi-Case Analysis. Project Management Journal, 51(2), 199-213.

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. (2020). Communication Platforms and Scope Control in Construction Projects. JCEM, 146(8), 04020085.

Journal of Information Technology Project Management. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Project Management Software: Current Applications and Future Prospects. JITPM, 10(4), 37-54.

Journal of Modern Project Management. (2021). Real-Time KPI Tracking and Scope Creep Prevention. JMPM, 8(3), 180-195.

Journal of Systems and Software. (2020). Automated Scope Verification Tools: A Comparative Analysis. JSS, 170, 110726.

Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.

Project Management Institute. (2018). Pulse of the Profession 2018. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.

Project Management Institute. (2021). The Future of Work: Leading the Way with PMTQ. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.

Reeves, M., & Cho, Y. (2019). Requirements Management Techniques and Project Success: A Quantitative Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(3), 379-391.

Standish Group. (2020). CHAOS Report 2020: Beyond Infinity. Boston: Standish Group International, Inc.

Thompson, R. (2018). The Impact of Scope Statements on Project Performance: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 10(3), 217-233.

Swamy, H. (2020). Unsupervised machine learning for feedback loop processing in cognitive DevOps settings. Yingyong Jichu yu Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 17(1), 168-183. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382654014

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.36676/irt.v8.i4.1475
Published: 2022-12-30

How to Cite

SUNIL KUMAR SUVVARI. (2022). Managing Project Scope Creep: Strategies for Containing Changes. Innovative Research Thoughts, 8(4), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v8.i4.1475