Development of Public Administration and its Research in India through the Lenses of Content Analysis of the International Public Administration Review

Authors

  • Dr. Vikash “Lecturer Political Science, Deptt. Of Education Haryana”

Keywords:

Development of Public, International Public

Abstract

The development of public administration (PA) is a worldwide topic of research, considering its importance in resolving governance issues in contemporary society. Consequently, the question of PA as a scientific discipline arises at both national and broader levels. In order to explore the state of affairs in PA trends in India and its regional context, an analysis was conducted involving 78 papers published in the leading Slovenian scientific journal – the International Public Administration Review – between 2011 and 2014. Content analysis as a method applied in the research is a widely recognized approach in social sciences and in the field of PA as well. Taking into account the respective analyses of the papers in terms of predominating discipline and mainstream topics, affiliation and collaboration of authors, language, methods of research and other criteria, we examined three main guidelines of editorial policy, namely the journal’s interdisciplinary, international and practical orientation. The results reveal that PA in India is rather multidisciplinary, with a prevailing role of management (HRM in particular), law and economics (the latter even mostly monodisciplinary). International and practical aspects, on the other hand, still offer some room for improvement. In sum, to support PA’s progress and its disciplinary evolution in line with global trends and the IPAR mission, a systematic interdisciplinary and allEuropean approach in future theory and practice is inevitable.

References

 The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles: Sage. Bingham, R. D., & Bowen, W. M. (1994).

 “Mainstream” Public Administration over Time: A Topical Content Analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 204–208. DOI: 10.2307/976531 Brezovšek, M., Haček, M., & Kukovič, S. (2014).

 Javna uprava [Public Administration]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences. Bučar, F. (1969). Uvod v javno upravo [Introduction to Public Administration]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette RS. Cheng, J. Y. S., & Lu, L. Q. (2009).

 Public Administration Research Issues in China: Evidence from Content Analysis of Leading Chinese Public Administration Journals. Issues & Studies, 45(1), 203–241. Drewry, G. (2014).

 he administrative sciences, from the past to the future (by a roundabout route). International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 3–22. DOI: 10.1177/0020852313511766 Dunn, N. W., Staronova, K., & Pushkarev, S. (Eds.) (2006).

 Implementation: The Missing Link in Public Administration Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee. Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.) (2011).

 Administrative Reforms and Democratic Governance. London and New York: Routledge. Godec, R. (Ed.) (1993).

 Upravni zbornik [Administrative Proceedings]. Ljubljana: Institute of Public Administration. Harlow, C., & R. Rawlings. (1997).

 Law and Administration. London, Edinburgh, Dublin: Butterworths. Henderson, A. C., & Terry, L. D. (2014).

 Unpacking the Global Perspective: Examining NISPAcee Region-Focused Public Administration Research in American Scholarly Journals. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(6), 353–362. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2013.837072

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Dr. Vikash. (2018). Development of Public Administration and its Research in India through the Lenses of Content Analysis of the International Public Administration Review. Innovative Research Thoughts, 4(3), 213–218. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1265