An Analysis of Trends, Patterns and Policies in Asia of Urbanisation and Migration

Authors

  • Madhu Dept. of Geography, Research scholars of Om Sterling Global University, Hisar

Keywords:

urbanisation, migration

Abstract

The present paper overviews urbanization and migration process in Asian countries at macro level since 1950s, including the projections made till 2030. It questions the thesis of southward movement of urbanisation and that of urban explosion in Asia. Increased unaffordability of urban space and basic amenities, negative policy perspective towards migration and various rural development pogrammes designed to discourage migration are responsible for this exclusionary urban growth and a distinct decline in urban rural growth differential, with the major exception of China. The changing structure of urban population across different size categories reveals a shift of growth dynamics from large to second order cities and stagnation of small towns. The pace of urbanization has been modest to high in select countries in Asia, not because of their level of economic growth but its composition and labour intensity of rapidly growing informal sectors. Several countries have launched programmes for improving governance and infrastructural facilities in a few large cities, attracting private investors from within as well as outside the country. These have pushed out squatter settlements, informal sector businesses along with a large number of pollutant industries to a few pockets and peripheries of the cities. The income level and quality of basic amenities in these cities, as a result, have gone up but that has been associated with increased intra-city disparity and creation of degenerated periphery. Nonetheless, there is no strong evidence that urbanization is associated with destabilization of agrarian economy, poverty and immiserisation, despite the measures of globalization resulting in regional imbalances. The overview of the trend and pattern suggests that the pace of urbanization would be reasonably high but much below the level projected by UNPD in the coming decades.

References

Black, R. C. Natali and J. Skinner. (2005): “Migration and Inequality”, Background paper prepared for the World Development Report 2006 on Equity & Development,

Cernia, M. (1989): The Urban Environment and Population Relocation, World Bank Discussion Paper

Chan, Kam Wing and Will Buckingham. (2008): “Is China abolishing the hukou system?”, The China Quarterly, No. 195

Harris J. and M. Todaro. (1970): “Migration, Unemployment & Development: A Two-Sector Analysis”, American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 1

Hatton, T. J., and J. G. Willamson. (1992): “What Explains Wage Gaps between Farm and City? Exploring the Todaro Model with American Evidence, 1890-1941”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.40, No. 2

Homeless International and Asian Coalition for Housing Rights. (2006): “Understanding Asian Cities”, Proceedings of the conference on ASIA2015 – Promoting Growth, Ending Poverty, held during 6-7 March, 2006, London

Kundu, A., S. Bagchi, and D. Kundu. (1999): “Regional Distribution of Infrastructure and Basic Amenities in Urban India – Issues Concerning Empowerment of Local Bodies”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 34, No. 28

Oberai, A. S. and H. K. Singh. (1983): Causes and consequences of internal migration: a study in the Indian Punjab. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India.

Satterthwaite, David. (2005): Understanding Asian Cities: A Synthesis of the Findings from the City Case Studies, Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, October.

Sheikh, Khatibullah. (2007): Emerging Patterns of Urbanisation in the GCC Countries, Academic Excellence, Delhi

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Madhu. (2021). An Analysis of Trends, Patterns and Policies in Asia of Urbanisation and Migration. Innovative Research Thoughts, 7(4), 30–40. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1061