The Impact of Technology on Library Services: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Libraries and Digital Libraries

Authors

  • Kurminla Shruti Dhananjay Research Scholar Department of Library and Information Science Kalinga University, Raipur(CG)

Keywords:

Technology, Library Services, Traditional Libraries, Digital Libraries, Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Throughout history, libraries have been regarded as citadels of knowledge, acting as indispensable resources for the transmission of information and the conduct of academic study. The landscape of library services, on the other hand, has experienced a considerable alteration as a result of the introduction of technology, notably the emergence of digital libraries. This article provides a comparative comparison of traditional libraries versus digital libraries, focusing on the influence that technology has had on several areas of library services. the primary tasks of libraries, which include the creation of collections, the organisation of those collections, access to data, and the transmission of information. Historically, traditional libraries have depended on physical collections for a very long time. These collections consist of books, periodicals, and other items that are stored off-site. Digital libraries, on the other hand, make use of technology to enable access to huge repositories of digital resources. These resources include archive collections, research papers, multimedia assets, and electronic books. The transition from physical to digital representations has repercussions for several aspects of preservation techniques, including resource procurement, cataloguing, and preservation.

References

 Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World. MIT Press.

 Chowdhury, G. G. (2010). Introduction to Digital Libraries. Facet Publishing.

 Hider, P. (2008). Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata. Facet Publishing.

 Kaur, K., & Rani, S. (2019). Digital Libraries: An Overview. In I. M. Alhamdoosh, M. A. M. Sari, & A. Elngar (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1-17). IGI Global.

 Lesk, M. E. (2005). Understanding Digital Libraries (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

 Lynch, C., & Lippincott, J. K. (Eds.). (2008). E-books in Libraries: A Practical Guide. American Library Association.

 Morris, S., & Rothbauer, P. M. (Eds.). (2018). Library and Information Science in the Age of MOOCs. Library Juice Press.

 Singh, D. (2013). Digital Library Initiatives: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges. In M. U. Bokhari & A. H. Bukhari (Eds.), Libraries in the Digital Age: Concepts, Practices, and Professionalism (pp. 152-170). Ess Ess Publications.

 Stewart, J. (2017). Libraries and Digital Technology: Future Perspectives for the Integration of Digital Libraries. In A. Martínez-Sánchez, N. Chacón-López, & J. M. Martín-Vaquero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Digital Libraries: Design, Development, and Impact (pp. 1-26). IGI Global.

 Xiao, L. (2013). Digital Library Development in China: Status Quo, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. In A. W. Richardson & R. W. Wisneski (Eds.), Global Library and Information Science: A Textbook for Students and Educators (pp. 223-240). IGI Global.

 Source: Gani MLS These 2014

 Source: Contrast between traditional and digital libraries is presented below. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Comparative-analysis-and-benefits-of-digital-over-Bamgbade-Akintola/59b0643c73a3c1a9b37da590c93c9a36d4b95cb3/figure/0.

Source:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361446626_A_Comparative_Study_about_Expansion_of_Digital_Libraries_in_the_Current_Era_and_Existence_of_Traditional_Library

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Kurminla Shruti Dhananjay. (2022). The Impact of Technology on Library Services: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Libraries and Digital Libraries. Innovative Research Thoughts, 8(1), 168–173. Retrieved from http://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1121